03-23-2020, 10:42 PM
(03-23-2020, 10:27 PM)RJ_82 Wrote: This NYT opinion article proposes an alternative, more targeted response to the virus crisis. It has three primary elements/benefits: (i) greater focus of resources on those most at risk (the elderly), (ii) reduced co-habitation of multi-generational families, which inadvertently increases contagion, and (iii) dramatically less negative impact on the economy by enabling more people to work normally. This strategy seems superior than our current, broad shelter-in-place strategy, which may flatten the economy more than the curve.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/opini...ncing.html
Pay wall. Would be nice to have coronavirus articles for free. Even the Merc has loosened their pay wall. . . .
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
