[BostonCard]

Bills to correct oversights and clarify ambiguities (technical fixes) are par for the course for most bills of this size and complexity.  Here's a story from 1987 about technical fixes to Reagan's 1986 tax reform bill.

https://www.nytimes.com/1987/03/08/busin...wanted=all

However, partisanship has made these technical correction bills more difficult to pass (Senate Republicans filibustered a technical correction to the ACA, and similar partisanship beset the tax cut and jobs act of a couple years ago).  However, for something like this, which was negotiated and passed in a bipartisan way, I expect the technical correction bill to also pass in a bipartisan way.

So, the long and short of it is "nothing to see here".

BC

[BostonCard]

Bills to correct oversights and clarify ambiguities (technical fixes) are par for the course for most bills of this size and complexity.  Here's a story from 1987 about technical fixes to Reagan's 1986 tax reform bill.

https://www.nytimes.com/1987/03/08/busin...wanted=all

However, partisanship has made these technical correction bills more difficult to pass (Senate Republicans filibustered a technical correction to the ACA, and similar partisanship beset the tax cut and jobs act of a couple years ago).  However, for something like this, which was negotiated and passed in a bipartisan way, I expect the technical correction bill to also pass in a bipartisan way.

So, the long and short of it is "nothing to see here".

BC