03-30-2020, 08:43 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-30-2020, 08:50 AM by BostonCard.)
I should add that for most people, the mask is probably most effective as a signaling device. As Mick recounted in his anecdote, seeing someone with a mask is an immediate reminder that there is an pandemic going on and that a random person on the airplane you have just seen with a mask could be sick. I'll bet dollars to donuts that the first class passenger, even though they accepted Mick's explanation that he was wearing the N95 as a precaution, nonetheless washed their hands right after the encounter, and probably took care to maintain social distancing with Mick and others.
BC
One thing that is striking is that their estimate of R0 (3 - 4) is higher than what has been published recently. Also, the effect of the interventions short of lockdown are depressingly small.
BC
BC
(03-30-2020, 08:38 AM)2006alum Wrote: Returning to the subject of this thread, interesting new estimates from the Imperial College crew on SARS-COV-2 attack rates by country, and what this means for whether the R0 has fallen below 1. The good news is that R0 seems to fall below 1 pretty rapidly once social distancing measures are implemented:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/joshmich/status/1244645728619827200?s=20[/tweet]
And they take a crack at trying to estimate the lives saved as a result:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/joshmich/status/1244645735381032961?s=20[/tweet]
One thing that is striking is that their estimate of R0 (3 - 4) is higher than what has been published recently. Also, the effect of the interventions short of lockdown are depressingly small.
BC
