[2006alum]

How do we know to trust that reviewer more than the original author?  All we've been given in that tweet are 15 words.  They aren't engraved in a stone tablet brought down from the mountain.

(I happen to agree with those words, but that's not the point.)

I personally don't like all the tweets, often from self-appointed pundits, that we've been getting in this forum.  They are just institutionalized sound bites!

Read the underlying tweet it was referring to. It brings receipts, and seems to make some pretty legit criticisms to bear:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/llborio/status/1246051564307038211?s=20[/tweet]

[2006alum]

How do we know to trust that reviewer more than the original author?  All we've been given in that tweet are 15 words.  They aren't engraved in a stone tablet brought down from the mountain.

(I happen to agree with those words, but that's not the point.)

I personally don't like all the tweets, often from self-appointed pundits, that we've been getting in this forum.  They are just institutionalized sound bites!

Read the underlying tweet it was referring to. It brings receipts, and seems to make some pretty legit criticisms to bear:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/llborio/status/1246051564307038211?s=20[/tweet]