[winflop]

that could make hector's press release accurate on a technicality as filming and distributing the video (without the girl's consent) could be said to be not exactly sexual misconduct. but if true, it's still illegal and reprehensible.

His statement reads that he was a "cooperating witness" and nothing more. If he filmed it, then he's a whole lot more than that. Also, he knows that Stanford cannot disclose its reasons for withdrawing his admission offer, so making a statement about why it was rescinded will remain a one-sided argument. At a minimum, there are serious integrity and honesty issues.

[winflop]

that could make hector's press release accurate on a technicality as filming and distributing the video (without the girl's consent) could be said to be not exactly sexual misconduct. but if true, it's still illegal and reprehensible.

His statement reads that he was a "cooperating witness" and nothing more. If he filmed it, then he's a whole lot more than that. Also, he knows that Stanford cannot disclose its reasons for withdrawing his admission offer, so making a statement about why it was rescinded will remain a one-sided argument. At a minimum, there are serious integrity and honesty issues.