[burger]

It seems the data demonstrates there are at least 10x more infections than confirmed cases.

I want to focus on this for a second.  I don't think this is correct.  There are indications that this might be true in some places.  But it would be a mistake to assume that 10x rule of thumb is a good estimate everywhere. 

In places that have done very little testing, the multiplier is probably bigger than 10.  In places that have done a lot of testing or where you have a lot of susceptible people which means that more people end up in the hospital (where they get tested), the multiplier might be lower. 

10x is really just a very, very rough estimate, and the real number will differ from place to place.

[burger]

It seems the data demonstrates there are at least 10x more infections than confirmed cases.

I want to focus on this for a second.  I don't think this is correct.  There are indications that this might be true in some places.  But it would be a mistake to assume that 10x rule of thumb is a good estimate everywhere. 

In places that have done very little testing, the multiplier is probably bigger than 10.  In places that have done a lot of testing or where you have a lot of susceptible people which means that more people end up in the hospital (where they get tested), the multiplier might be lower. 

10x is really just a very, very rough estimate, and the real number will differ from place to place.