[2006alum]

Since even the thread title now acknowledges that this 18-year-old no longer has any affiliation with Stanford, is there any reason we need to keep discussing this? We know nothing about what he told Stanford nor what Stanford learned and when, so I'm not really sure this game is worth the candle.

[2006alum]

Since even the thread title now acknowledges that this 18-year-old no longer has any affiliation with Stanford, is there any reason we need to keep discussing this? We know nothing about what he told Stanford nor what Stanford learned and when, so I'm not really sure this game is worth the candle.