[Goose]

(Note that SCC has "Positive Results" equal to "Total Cases" which seems unlikely.  So "Positive Results" probably isn't a raw number of outcome over the number of tests given.)

At one point SCC was saying that "positive" results for one patient were only reported once, while multiple negative samples from a single patient may result in multiple negative reports. It is a bit strange that SCC seems to be saying that a positive test is the only way they diagnose COVID-19. Certainly in other areas some cases (many cases in fact) were diagnosed without testing at all or without testing positive. Does seem strange to me also.

[Goose]

(Note that SCC has "Positive Results" equal to "Total Cases" which seems unlikely.  So "Positive Results" probably isn't a raw number of outcome over the number of tests given.)

At one point SCC was saying that "positive" results for one patient were only reported once, while multiple negative samples from a single patient may result in multiple negative reports. It is a bit strange that SCC seems to be saying that a positive test is the only way they diagnose COVID-19. Certainly in other areas some cases (many cases in fact) were diagnosed without testing at all or without testing positive. Does seem strange to me also.