05-09-2020, 05:02 AM
(This post was last modified: 05-09-2020, 05:22 AM by JohnR34231.)
(05-09-2020, 03:59 AM)winflop Wrote: If there were recency bias then Shaw wouldn't belong on this list at all.
Shaw is to some extent a victim of his own success.
Once upon a time a, say, 9-4 record would be considered excellent at Stanford and a coach who achieved it would be highly regarded.
Thanks in part to Shaw's record from 2011-2015 it no longer is.

