[ChicagoCard]

Do not have a science background, and also not comfortable with the message of the virus dying out whether that message comes from the President or this "scientist" of the removed youtube video. But it came as a bit of a shock as I saw it as part of a series providing a platform for various science people and other supposed thinkers, some of which I alluded to. I know the decision to take it down has nothing to do with that consideration. If it's about the "lie" about the virus dying out, then ok I guess. But clearly the interview was hardly a tissue of lies throughout. Part of what they were discussing was the concept of fear which although uncomfortable or tricky or whatever, surely has to be a topic unworthy of censure. But maybe it did actually cross the line. The message of the people behind that channel left it at that after the removal, let people be the judge.

[ChicagoCard]

Do not have a science background, and also not comfortable with the message of the virus dying out whether that message comes from the President or this "scientist" of the removed youtube video. But it came as a bit of a shock as I saw it as part of a series providing a platform for various science people and other supposed thinkers, some of which I alluded to. I know the decision to take it down has nothing to do with that consideration. If it's about the "lie" about the virus dying out, then ok I guess. But clearly the interview was hardly a tissue of lies throughout. Part of what they were discussing was the concept of fear which although uncomfortable or tricky or whatever, surely has to be a topic unworthy of censure. But maybe it did actually cross the line. The message of the people behind that channel left it at that after the removal, let people be the judge.