[2006alum]

You're right 2006alum -- I even highlighted the same excerpt you had originally pointed out -- my bad!

Should I delete the post? Fold it into the prior thread?

My only very weak defense is that  the previous thread drifted a little so I didn't immediately associate it.

Nah we're all good. Mostly I was just disappointed no one else responded because I thought a k of .1 to be a potential gamechanger if true. I probably should have labelled the thread more clearly. Thanks for restarting this discussion.

But clearly you and I are on the same wavelength across three different threads right now! ;) (re: appeal of WFH and also First Amendment applications to the lockdowns).

[2006alum]

You're right 2006alum -- I even highlighted the same excerpt you had originally pointed out -- my bad!

Should I delete the post? Fold it into the prior thread?

My only very weak defense is that  the previous thread drifted a little so I didn't immediately associate it.

Nah we're all good. Mostly I was just disappointed no one else responded because I thought a k of .1 to be a potential gamechanger if true. I probably should have labelled the thread more clearly. Thanks for restarting this discussion.

But clearly you and I are on the same wavelength across three different threads right now! ;) (re: appeal of WFH and also First Amendment applications to the lockdowns).