[burger]

Another preprint from someone at Stanford. They used methods very similar to the paper I linked to in the OP and came up with a similar result: IFR ≈ 1%: https://www.researchhub.com/paper/817131/summary

I haven't read this one yet--just browsed through the figures.

It seems more than coincidental that we have two papers now from Stanford essentially refuting the studies by Ioannidis, Bhattacharya, etc.

[burger]

Another preprint from someone at Stanford. They used methods very similar to the paper I linked to in the OP and came up with a similar result: IFR ≈ 1%: https://www.researchhub.com/paper/817131/summary

I haven't read this one yet--just browsed through the figures.

It seems more than coincidental that we have two papers now from Stanford essentially refuting the studies by Ioannidis, Bhattacharya, etc.