07-19-2020, 02:43 PM
(07-19-2020, 02:05 PM)lex24 Wrote: Another non peer reviewed study. We’ve had way too many of those. With all sorts of conclusions. So many unknown unknowns.
Boy, if you don't like that, I wonder what you think of tweets? Who peer-reviews them? They are mostly fire-and-forget.
I wasn't quoting the 6 groupings of (early-stage) symptoms as anything definitive and suggesting anyone base treatment regimes by this article. I actually would trust it more than the quote of a doctor in a CNN article, which I also referenced. News articles are never peer-reviewed, and as we've seen, doctors may say things that aren't actually true, and reporters sometimes take things out of context.
My point was that this disease has many aspects. It isn't just a cough and pneumonia. There are reports from around the globe of different impacts on people. The longest survivors are just 7 months past their infection. A lot of this we haven't talked about here. At least, I can't remember anyone here working through a study, or giving incidence figures, for coagulation issues. I think it would be good to start paying attention to the longer term effects being reported.
But, some people have expressed opinions about the safety and importance of getting back to work or sending kids back to school. Reputedly, kids are less likely to get the disease (vs have gotten the disease less) and some seem to think that's all that matters.
