08-02-2020, 03:38 PM
(07-29-2020, 01:16 PM)OutsiderFan Wrote: These two statements can both be true:Didn't know where to put this article, but maybe here?
1. College students who play sports can be safer if sports are played.
2. Playing college sports presents too much of a risk to the health of athletes, coaches, and staff.
It all comes down to everyone behaving responsibly and not putting themselves in high risk situations. If everyone 100% followed the proper risk mitigating behavior, sports would be in great position. However, we can't count on 100% compliance, and probably a lot less than that. As usual, a few will spoil things for the many.
Quote:With the fate of the 2020 college football season in flux, the only certainty about the season remains the constant uncertainty. With big decisions by Power Five commissioners looming about the sport’s immediate future, the most prepared schools to play football this season remain the three military academies who play FBS football.
Army, Navy and Air Force all essentially operate in a bubble, which affords them what the other 127 FBS schools lack – a controlled environment to prepare for the season.
https://sports.yahoo.com/could-a-militar...41886.html