[OutsiderFan]

I am not seeing anything objectionable.   Personally, both for my workplace and for schools I am VERY interested in rapid testing, even if some level of accuracy is sacrificed.

It's a no-brainer, right? Letting perfect testing be the enemy of good enough, is a prime example of the "can't do attitude" plaguing our society these days that I lamented in a previous post. How can the FDA not approve these lower sensitivity/immediate result, cheap tests that can be taken at home on a mass scale?

[OutsiderFan]

I am not seeing anything objectionable.   Personally, both for my workplace and for schools I am VERY interested in rapid testing, even if some level of accuracy is sacrificed.

It's a no-brainer, right? Letting perfect testing be the enemy of good enough, is a prime example of the "can't do attitude" plaguing our society these days that I lamented in a previous post. How can the FDA not approve these lower sensitivity/immediate result, cheap tests that can be taken at home on a mass scale?