[Mick]

The Wehner interview is pretty reasonable.  His analysis of Obama divisiveness seems to be: 1) He promised to heal divisions and didn't do that; 2) He accused Replublicans of putting party before country; and 3) He was so smart and analytical that once he reached a position on something he felt that if you couldn't see how reasonable and rational it was you must be cynical.  All fair and Obama was too partisan in my opinion although divisiveness is in the eye of the beholder. Note that the interview was done before Trump was inaugurated.  Wehner is a very smart guy and if one looks at what he is saying more recently he is not wasting a lot breath comparing Trump to Obama or blaming Obama for Trump -- you stop complaining about your neighbor's aggressive Jack Russell when the other neighbor brings home a pitbull:

https://lithub.com/peter-wehner-i-am-cri...servative/

https://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/...f-m-forum/

TERRY RULE!!!

[Mick]

The Wehner interview is pretty reasonable.  His analysis of Obama divisiveness seems to be: 1) He promised to heal divisions and didn't do that; 2) He accused Replublicans of putting party before country; and 3) He was so smart and analytical that once he reached a position on something he felt that if you couldn't see how reasonable and rational it was you must be cynical.  All fair and Obama was too partisan in my opinion although divisiveness is in the eye of the beholder. Note that the interview was done before Trump was inaugurated.  Wehner is a very smart guy and if one looks at what he is saying more recently he is not wasting a lot breath comparing Trump to Obama or blaming Obama for Trump -- you stop complaining about your neighbor's aggressive Jack Russell when the other neighbor brings home a pitbull:

https://lithub.com/peter-wehner-i-am-cri...servative/

https://www.minnpost.com/eric-black-ink/...f-m-forum/

TERRY RULE!!!