09-11-2020, 11:36 AM
(09-10-2020, 10:05 PM)teejers1 Wrote: In the category of information obfuscation, I would add this:
How many patients, between the ages of 20-30, who had zero comorbidities died from Covid 19?
Same question for each decade of age.
It's incredible to me that they are not sharing this information because they clearly have it: they report how many people died and what age group the decedents fall into; they also relay how many of those dying were known to have at least one comorbidity; but for some reason, they refuse to connect the two data sets. It's ridiculous, really, and only adds to the mistrust of those providing the numbers.
I mean, I think it's mathematically possible that the number of those dying with zero comorbidities under the age of 50 is . . . 0.
P.S. The "community spread" category I view as a catchall, as I don't think contact tracing is worth a damn in this county - so that's the easy/default category.
it would also be good to know the % of people in each age group estimated to have a least one condition that could be made worse when combined with COVID-19
Eric
"the older we get the better we were"