(10-22-2020, 07:06 PM)teejers1 Wrote:(10-22-2020, 05:33 PM)lex24 Wrote: Could care less about whether the Niners get fans. Personally I agree that mass events like this is probably not smart. But I don’t think Cody should be able to make this decisionAs noted, I could not care less about fans in stands for 'Niners games, either. But I'm trying to cling to a policy of "evaluate each proposal" and allow it if it's relatively safe (always assuming hospital capacity allows for loosening). And when I see massive stadiums - like the Philly game tonight - with fans scattered about in very small clusters and in very small numbers - it doesn't strike me as particularly dangerous at all. Now, that's not true when it comes to other stadia, particularly some of the college venues in SEC where it looked like there were WAY too many fans in too close proximity to each other. The point is, when it comes to stadia, there ought to be some metrics that are reasonable enough to allow attendance. But with Cody & Co. that seems not to be the case.
So my question to you is this: if Levi's had 10K fans spread out in the open-air stadium, would you really view that as an unacceptable risk?
Forget about, if you can, your own personal priorities (which can be hard to do, I admit).
I honestly don’t know, Teejers. I wouldn’t go personally. And, I’ve gone to weddings, movies, restaurants, done a whole bunch of things. Mass events would make me a little nervous. I don’t think it would be a super spreader risk if that’s what you’re asking. But hey you know protests involving millions of people over long periods of times aren’t super spreaders so I can’t see how a few people hanging out in the football game would be right?
I come from a different angle. And that is I really want this to be decided by elected officials with input from their health directors. Not from people like Dr. Cody who are not elected and as far as I can tell have damn near unlimited power at this time.
