12-09-2020, 10:52 AM
(12-09-2020, 10:15 AM)lex24 Wrote:(12-09-2020, 07:40 AM)cardcrimson Wrote:(12-08-2020, 09:29 PM)lex24 Wrote:(12-08-2020, 08:38 PM)cardcrimson Wrote:(12-08-2020, 08:09 PM)lex24 Wrote: Certainly not Leach. If he stays he’ll develop just fine under Shaw Pritchard etc.
Example please.
Hogan. Costello until he got hurt. Mills is improving. Beginning to show what was hoped. If he stays, and is healthy, he will be the best QB in the Pac-12 next year.
Shaw and Pritchard’s biggest failure was Burns. I remember the one loyal follower he had. Knew a thing or two about Quarterbacks. Felt Burns got screwed when they went to Chryst for the weaker half of the season. And that Burns was better than Chryst. He was probably right. Chryst had horrible mechanics. Which one wouldn't expect given his lineage.
Hogan did improve, but last I checked, he's not made a regular NFL squad. He was recently added to a practice squad somewhere, but kind of sad that for a university with such a rich tradition at QB, we've put no one into the NFL since Luck. . . .
Hogan has made a squad. Played a few games. Even started once or twice at Cleveland. Costello may get a shot. Mills will if he can stay healthy. If that holds 3 of the 5 starting QBs will get some NFL experience. Leach is considered as a guru. Go look at his record of getting QBs to the NFL. Rather poor.
Interesting table:
http://www.espn.com/nfl/players/_/position/qb
Though I didn't dig too deeply, NC State has four QBs in the NFL; Missouri three; lots of teams with two. I'm sure I missed a lot too.
Stanford? Goose egg. Aside from the "40 year decision", what incentive is there for a QB to come to Stanford if they want to get to the next level?
Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.
