[teejers1]

As far as incentives go, I think that Stanford's main selling point is the 40-year decision. So why push that aside?

True . . . but remember when it wasn't necessarily the "main selling point" - i.e., when you could come to Stanford and play for CFP/NY6 Bowls?

Squandered.

[teejers1]

As far as incentives go, I think that Stanford's main selling point is the 40-year decision. So why push that aside?

True . . . but remember when it wasn't necessarily the "main selling point" - i.e., when you could come to Stanford and play for CFP/NY6 Bowls?

Squandered.