02-15-2021, 09:19 PM
(02-15-2021, 09:14 PM)2006alum Wrote:(02-15-2021, 08:52 PM)BostonCard Wrote: Agree with you farm, but it doesn’t explain why wrestling was cut. Definitely not a 1%er sport.
BC
Do we know what the gender balance was of everything else cut? Field hockey, squash, women's sailing, and synchronized swimming all have no male equivalents. So I wonder if it was to balance that out? I agree that wrestling is among the least compelling from the standpoint of reducing a privileged path of access to Stanford.
Yeah, not a lot of trust funders hitting the mats.
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.
