[Softball Fan]

I was cheering for OSU because I always cheer for the underdog and I don't care for the courtside antics of the UCLA coach.  However, it would have been better for Stanford if UCLA had won.  Assuming Stanford doesn't have a meltdown they will be seeded higher (better) than UCLA.  In this scenario Stanford wants UCLA to have the best possible resume. 

The W-L record of OSU at this point is not of particular relevance to Stanford's seeding.  Of course, OSU making the tournament helps the PAC-12 overall.

[Softball Fan]

I was cheering for OSU because I always cheer for the underdog and I don't care for the courtside antics of the UCLA coach.  However, it would have been better for Stanford if UCLA had won.  Assuming Stanford doesn't have a meltdown they will be seeded higher (better) than UCLA.  In this scenario Stanford wants UCLA to have the best possible resume. 

The W-L record of OSU at this point is not of particular relevance to Stanford's seeding.  Of course, OSU making the tournament helps the PAC-12 overall.