[Softball Fan]

I considered Wilson in my original post on this topic.  In my terminology she is a serving specialist; playing one out of six rotations.  I view that role to be a serving sub, but I can see her being classified as a starter.

Looking at tomorrow's match I'm interested to see if Lougeay is going to play.  In the fall Stanford desperately needs a good DS.  At this point Lougeay's skills are unclear because she hasn't played in a college game.  If Lougeay doesn't look like the answer, Stanford's #1 recruiting priority should be a DS. 

From the spring season IMO it is painfully clear Barty can't pass at a D1 level.  Baird isn't much better.  The fact that Kipp hasn't even been given a chance to be in the passing rotation kinda indicates Hambly's opinion of Kipp's passing.  

Without McClure in the fall, who will pass the ball.  Oglivie looks pretty solid but that's about it.

[Softball Fan]

I considered Wilson in my original post on this topic.  In my terminology she is a serving specialist; playing one out of six rotations.  I view that role to be a serving sub, but I can see her being classified as a starter.

Looking at tomorrow's match I'm interested to see if Lougeay is going to play.  In the fall Stanford desperately needs a good DS.  At this point Lougeay's skills are unclear because she hasn't played in a college game.  If Lougeay doesn't look like the answer, Stanford's #1 recruiting priority should be a DS. 

From the spring season IMO it is painfully clear Barty can't pass at a D1 level.  Baird isn't much better.  The fact that Kipp hasn't even been given a chance to be in the passing rotation kinda indicates Hambly's opinion of Kipp's passing.  

Without McClure in the fall, who will pass the ball.  Oglivie looks pretty solid but that's about it.