[BillBradley]

Some additional stats:

Points in the paint (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 8 6 12 10 - 36
Arizona - 0 10 8 2 - 20

2nd chance points (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 5 6 0 0 - 11
Arizona - 0 0 0 0 - 0

Points off turnovers (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 3 2 0 2 - 7
Arizona - 0 4 4 4 - 12

Fast break points (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 2 0 4 0 - 6
Arizona - 0 2 6 6 - 14

---

Generally, I find griping about officials to be a bit distasteful, especially when both teams can point to legitimate blown calls (for example, the out of bounds late in the game that gave us possession, even though the ball clearly went off a Stanford player).  Discrepancies in fouls can be illuminating, but they are not, in and of themselves, evidence of bias.  In this case, it reflects the difference in style.


BC

Ryan Ruocco and Rebecca Lobo (and apparently their producers) completely missed that the officials called a foul on Sam Thomas on the ball that went out of bounds off of a Stanford player. It was not a blown call by the referees. Check the box score. That play happened at 2:03, just outside the window when officials could use video review (as noted by the announcers).

Thanks for confirming Spiny.  Thought I saw a foul call but the broadcast team fixated on the out of bounds.

Yes, thanks Spiny. That's good to know. I have some non-Stanford fans in my circle who like to toss b.s. my way. That play has come up a lot. Now I can toss back :>

[BillBradley]

Some additional stats:

Points in the paint (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 8 6 12 10 - 36
Arizona - 0 10 8 2 - 20

2nd chance points (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 5 6 0 0 - 11
Arizona - 0 0 0 0 - 0

Points off turnovers (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 3 2 0 2 - 7
Arizona - 0 4 4 4 - 12

Fast break points (by quarter and total)
Stanford - 2 0 4 0 - 6
Arizona - 0 2 6 6 - 14

---

Generally, I find griping about officials to be a bit distasteful, especially when both teams can point to legitimate blown calls (for example, the out of bounds late in the game that gave us possession, even though the ball clearly went off a Stanford player).  Discrepancies in fouls can be illuminating, but they are not, in and of themselves, evidence of bias.  In this case, it reflects the difference in style.


BC

Ryan Ruocco and Rebecca Lobo (and apparently their producers) completely missed that the officials called a foul on Sam Thomas on the ball that went out of bounds off of a Stanford player. It was not a blown call by the referees. Check the box score. That play happened at 2:03, just outside the window when officials could use video review (as noted by the announcers).

Thanks for confirming Spiny.  Thought I saw a foul call but the broadcast team fixated on the out of bounds.

Yes, thanks Spiny. That's good to know. I have some non-Stanford fans in my circle who like to toss b.s. my way. That play has come up a lot. Now I can toss back :>