[SamuelMcF]

OK, a 46% 3-pt FG% is completely not possible unless the sample size is small, but still, anybody who ever shoots enough 3s to have a 46% make percentage at any time, has to be considered a credible outside shooter.

I took a look at Raynaud's league game log and here are the numbers. In 10 games:
3pt: 6/13 (46%)
FTs: 18/23 (78%)

So yes, small sample size, but he was consistently shooting 1-2 long balls per game according to the game log. Pretty much exactly backs up your point.

The free throws, while also a somewhat small sample size, are encouraging because:
1. FT% is known to generally coincide with overall shooting ability.
2. Our current bigs are just awful at them.
(FWIW I count Murrell as a stretch 4 a la Delaire, not a pure big. Murrell was 16-16 on FTs, which led the nation in most FTs without a miss.)

[SamuelMcF]

OK, a 46% 3-pt FG% is completely not possible unless the sample size is small, but still, anybody who ever shoots enough 3s to have a 46% make percentage at any time, has to be considered a credible outside shooter.

I took a look at Raynaud's league game log and here are the numbers. In 10 games:
3pt: 6/13 (46%)
FTs: 18/23 (78%)

So yes, small sample size, but he was consistently shooting 1-2 long balls per game according to the game log. Pretty much exactly backs up your point.

The free throws, while also a somewhat small sample size, are encouraging because:
1. FT% is known to generally coincide with overall shooting ability.
2. Our current bigs are just awful at them.
(FWIW I count Murrell as a stretch 4 a la Delaire, not a pure big. Murrell was 16-16 on FTs, which led the nation in most FTs without a miss.)