[teejers1]

Cal #1.

What hurts more? Cal first on Forbes or a possible Big Game loss?

Good for Cal. 
Of course, it's all pretty meaningless.
As was the case all those years that Stanford was atop the USN&WR "rankings."  
Just agenda, cloaked in supposed measurable indicia of "greatness."

Whatever.
Does anyone really care about these various publications/rankings?  And if so . . . why?

P.S.  To answer your question:  Big Game loss.

[teejers1]

Cal #1.

What hurts more? Cal first on Forbes or a possible Big Game loss?

Good for Cal. 
Of course, it's all pretty meaningless.
As was the case all those years that Stanford was atop the USN&WR "rankings."  
Just agenda, cloaked in supposed measurable indicia of "greatness."

Whatever.
Does anyone really care about these various publications/rankings?  And if so . . . why?

P.S.  To answer your question:  Big Game loss.