[teejers1]

Stanford has been playing extraordinarily bad football these last few weeks.  Unless something changes, like getting McKee and a few others back, I think they'd lose to the vast majority of Division 1 teams, and a good number of FCS teams.  The lack speed, scheme, coaching, play-calling, tackling, blocking, strength, conditioning, and fire.  Just atrocious.  Being favored by only 4 points is probably locker room motivation for Cal. 

That said....    Why does cal get to postpone a game when they claim a bunch of their players tested positive for covid, whereas Stanford has to take it on the chin when a bunch of its players are unavailable due to actual football injuries?  Seems a bit like Judge Smail's broken arm to me.... Just say'n.

Agree with your post.
I did something I've never done before: bet against Stanford (as a big underdog). Easy $$ in OSU game.
For some reason, I'm hesitant to do it for Big Game, though I think a running Garbers will cause problems for Stanford's D.
We'll see . . .

[teejers1]

Stanford has been playing extraordinarily bad football these last few weeks.  Unless something changes, like getting McKee and a few others back, I think they'd lose to the vast majority of Division 1 teams, and a good number of FCS teams.  The lack speed, scheme, coaching, play-calling, tackling, blocking, strength, conditioning, and fire.  Just atrocious.  Being favored by only 4 points is probably locker room motivation for Cal. 

That said....    Why does cal get to postpone a game when they claim a bunch of their players tested positive for covid, whereas Stanford has to take it on the chin when a bunch of its players are unavailable due to actual football injuries?  Seems a bit like Judge Smail's broken arm to me.... Just say'n.

Agree with your post.
I did something I've never done before: bet against Stanford (as a big underdog). Easy $$ in OSU game.
For some reason, I'm hesitant to do it for Big Game, though I think a running Garbers will cause problems for Stanford's D.
We'll see . . .