08-27-2012, 11:51 AM
Put Wilner firmly down on the Nunes-skepticism camp. Combined with his assertion earlier that there's no way Nunes makes it through September (or was it October?) healthy and unchallenged as the starter, and you begin to wonder who pissed in his Cheerios over the QB decision. A fine, evidence-based approach he's utilizing...
EDIT: not that I think the particular overall prediction is implausible, or even that Nunes will be (if I can infer from his article) a below-average QB. That might very well happen! Since I'm down for an 8/9 win season, I'm only slightly more optimistic than Wilner. Nevertheless the assumptions that Wilner makes--without evidence--are more than a bit grating.
EDIT2: It's also goofy that he talks about kal's speed. Come on: their speed? Get outta here.
EDIT: not that I think the particular overall prediction is implausible, or even that Nunes will be (if I can infer from his article) a below-average QB. That might very well happen! Since I'm down for an 8/9 win season, I'm only slightly more optimistic than Wilner. Nevertheless the assumptions that Wilner makes--without evidence--are more than a bit grating.
EDIT2: It's also goofy that he talks about kal's speed. Come on: their speed? Get outta here.
