[washingtonismoney]

One last note: you could view this as, possibly, a good projection on the season. Wilner projects us to have a relatively successful season at 8-4 despite assuming nearly every important question of the offseason to have a bittersweet if not sour answer. (And, conversely, assumes most opponents to have sweet answers to their own offseason questions--it's certainly possible the Huskies might have addressed our dominance on the line of scrimmage, or much better defense, but it seems odd to assign it a higher level of probability than our unresolved questions. In addition, Stanford's beaten the Huskies by 30+ points over the past two years. The Huskies could be much better and still lose by, like, 9 or something.)

[washingtonismoney]

One last note: you could view this as, possibly, a good projection on the season. Wilner projects us to have a relatively successful season at 8-4 despite assuming nearly every important question of the offseason to have a bittersweet if not sour answer. (And, conversely, assumes most opponents to have sweet answers to their own offseason questions--it's certainly possible the Huskies might have addressed our dominance on the line of scrimmage, or much better defense, but it seems odd to assign it a higher level of probability than our unresolved questions. In addition, Stanford's beaten the Huskies by 30+ points over the past two years. The Huskies could be much better and still lose by, like, 9 or something.)