[Farm93]

If this were to materialize, it would be a boon for Stanford:
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st...g-carousel

I can't believe I am with Sankey on both aspects.

It should not have been moved up to mid-December. 
Now that we've gone down that path moving it back would not address the coaching carousel and transfer portal moves in November.   Those things are now acceptable or expected, so those negatives will remain even if the signing period goes back. 

Therefore the December LOI and the new coaching craziness will remain.

[Farm93]

If this were to materialize, it would be a boon for Stanford:
https://www.espn.com/college-football/st...g-carousel

I can't believe I am with Sankey on both aspects.

It should not have been moved up to mid-December. 
Now that we've gone down that path moving it back would not address the coaching carousel and transfer portal moves in November.   Those things are now acceptable or expected, so those negatives will remain even if the signing period goes back. 

Therefore the December LOI and the new coaching craziness will remain.