[chrisk]

In a county with 92% vax rate. In a Covid Omicron surge that has minimal impact on those who are vax'd, why not just require proof of vaccination and mask wearing? Telling everyone to stay home is not helping.

If Stanford hasn't noticed, it's impossible to contain Omicron because it spreads so easily. Denmark had plans to shut things down, but decided the scrap them because they knew the shutdowns would be more damage than the good gained from them.

SCC hospitals aren't being stretched to capacity.  Only unvax'd are getting really sick, and they are now being charged for Covid-related care expenses, so if they want to go bankrupt because they thought they had "natural immunity" or want their "free-dumb," then let them have it. Those who are vax'd, boosted, and masked should be allowed to live their lives, not be punished for the deeds of the irresponsible.

So people from off-campus could attend games but students would be banned? That would not make sense either.

[chrisk]

In a county with 92% vax rate. In a Covid Omicron surge that has minimal impact on those who are vax'd, why not just require proof of vaccination and mask wearing? Telling everyone to stay home is not helping.

If Stanford hasn't noticed, it's impossible to contain Omicron because it spreads so easily. Denmark had plans to shut things down, but decided the scrap them because they knew the shutdowns would be more damage than the good gained from them.

SCC hospitals aren't being stretched to capacity.  Only unvax'd are getting really sick, and they are now being charged for Covid-related care expenses, so if they want to go bankrupt because they thought they had "natural immunity" or want their "free-dumb," then let them have it. Those who are vax'd, boosted, and masked should be allowed to live their lives, not be punished for the deeds of the irresponsible.

So people from off-campus could attend games but students would be banned? That would not make sense either.