[2006alum]

Assuming ca245's description of the plaintiffs' theory of the case is accurate (and I'm not suggesting it isn't), that seems like a pretty weak theory of antitrust violation. This seems like an opportunity to drum up publicity by shaming some increasingly unpopular and deep-pocketed defendants.

[2006alum]

Assuming ca245's description of the plaintiffs' theory of the case is accurate (and I'm not suggesting it isn't), that seems like a pretty weak theory of antitrust violation. This seems like an opportunity to drum up publicity by shaming some increasingly unpopular and deep-pocketed defendants.