[OutsiderFan]

Ask me if I consider Colgate a real game. Winless means against all teams not named Colgate, which is just a joke for Stanford to be playing. If you want to play an FCS team, play Portland State, UC Davis, Sac State, Montana, etc. Stanford even scheduled its bye week after its second game. Not real smart for a thin team.

But, I love how nobody addressed why I said Stanford would go winless; if it can't run the ball in dominant fashion in its Spring Scrimmage, and nobody argued Stanford did run the ball well in Spring scrimmage. Just fixate on arguing how winless is impossible because Colgate.

Tell me the difference in reaction if Stanford were to go 1-11 vs. 0-12. So it seems pretty silly to me to be harping on why gong winless is a crazy thing to say, rather than entertain what could make someone say going winless is a possibility, with no substantive objection against the assertion. Did ya'll notice how the only argument against going winless was fixated on freaking Colgate? Nobody is making an argument Stanford might beat USC, Washington, Oregon, Oregon State, ASU, Notre Dame, UCLA, WSU, Utah, Cal, or BYU, are they?

[OutsiderFan]

Ask me if I consider Colgate a real game. Winless means against all teams not named Colgate, which is just a joke for Stanford to be playing. If you want to play an FCS team, play Portland State, UC Davis, Sac State, Montana, etc. Stanford even scheduled its bye week after its second game. Not real smart for a thin team.

But, I love how nobody addressed why I said Stanford would go winless; if it can't run the ball in dominant fashion in its Spring Scrimmage, and nobody argued Stanford did run the ball well in Spring scrimmage. Just fixate on arguing how winless is impossible because Colgate.

Tell me the difference in reaction if Stanford were to go 1-11 vs. 0-12. So it seems pretty silly to me to be harping on why gong winless is a crazy thing to say, rather than entertain what could make someone say going winless is a possibility, with no substantive objection against the assertion. Did ya'll notice how the only argument against going winless was fixated on freaking Colgate? Nobody is making an argument Stanford might beat USC, Washington, Oregon, Oregon State, ASU, Notre Dame, UCLA, WSU, Utah, Cal, or BYU, are they?