Adding in stats for birdies, eagles, other for 4 rounds.
I'd think playing conditions on Wednesday (late morning/noon start) would be most like Round 1 and Round 4 for both teams, so I added that into the table.
Zhang and Engelmann seem to have stronger numbers than their opponent.
(Note that Zhang was only 2 strokes better than Nielsen on the late morning starts, so I wouldn't just assume her to dominate.)
Krauter looks pretty even.
When you look at Rounds 1 & 4, Seay could be considered almost even.
Heck will have to play a lot better to get her point. (I hope she sleeps in, as she did very well on the early morning rounds.)
I'd think playing conditions on Wednesday (late morning/noon start) would be most like Round 1 and Round 4 for both teams, so I added that into the table.
Zhang and Engelmann seem to have stronger numbers than their opponent.
(Note that Zhang was only 2 strokes better than Nielsen on the late morning starts, so I wouldn't just assume her to dominate.)
Krauter looks pretty even.
When you look at Rounds 1 & 4, Seay could be considered almost even.
Heck will have to play a lot better to get her point. (I hope she sleeps in, as she did very well on the early morning rounds.)
(05-24-2022, 11:04 PM)pauloalto Wrote: Individual scores for the 4 rounds of stroke play on this course over the initial days:
Relative to par, pars, birdies, eagles, other, Round 1, Round 4:
Seay: +9, 44, 9, 1, 18, +3, E Chen: +5, 44, 13, 0, 15, +4, E
Krauter: +7, 49, 9, 0, 14, +3, E Lu: +8, 44, 11, 0, 17, +4, +1
Engelmann: +7, 53, 7, 0, 12, -1, +6 Chacon: +11, 44, 9, 0, 19, +4, +4
Heck: +8, 43, 12, 0, 17, +4, +6 Lin: E, 54, 9, 0, 9, E, +2
Zhang: -6, 46, 15, 1, 10, -4, +3 Nielsen: +9, 50, 9, 0, 13, +1, E