[msqueri]

Actually, while I think we can/should shoot higher, there would be crazier things than trying to bring Wilcox in to replace Shaw. We could call it pulling an Esquer. As with baseball, the potential/base case of Stanford football is dramatically better than Cal football. Wilcox gets Teevens-esque results at Cal, all the way down to the similarities of a potent defense and a hopeless offensive line. What Wilcox at Stanford would mean for our defense would excite me. It's not crazy to think Wilcox could be a good coach at Stanford. Not one of the first 20 names I'd suggest, but this thread did make me think of the Esquer similarities.

[msqueri]

Actually, while I think we can/should shoot higher, there would be crazier things than trying to bring Wilcox in to replace Shaw. We could call it pulling an Esquer. As with baseball, the potential/base case of Stanford football is dramatically better than Cal football. Wilcox gets Teevens-esque results at Cal, all the way down to the similarities of a potent defense and a hopeless offensive line. What Wilcox at Stanford would mean for our defense would excite me. It's not crazy to think Wilcox could be a good coach at Stanford. Not one of the first 20 names I'd suggest, but this thread did make me think of the Esquer similarities.