[Hieronymus]

The game will actually be at UNC, the #2 seed, who hosts the second and third rounds. A product of our underseeding at #3, which is underscored by #2 seed St. Louis losing in the first round. (a team I and others criticized earlier in this thread for being seeded ahead of us due to RPI). We should be hosting the second and third rounds in one of the regions.

RPI was bad this year as we have discussed. I was picking on NC St as a ridiculous seed and I saw they went down in Rd 1 on Pk's as well to UCF. Good for UCLA who now gets an unseeded opponent.

By Massey Stanford has #s 4 (UNC), 5 (us) and 6 (UND) all in our regional. Even beyond not hosting, we got no favors in the seeding with 3 of the top 6 in the same bracket.

---

On a total side note - how the heck did USC lose to UC Irvine?

Couldn't happen to. a lovelier school but seriously? UCI was 66 in Massey and too lazy to look up their RPI.

[Hieronymus]

The game will actually be at UNC, the #2 seed, who hosts the second and third rounds. A product of our underseeding at #3, which is underscored by #2 seed St. Louis losing in the first round. (a team I and others criticized earlier in this thread for being seeded ahead of us due to RPI). We should be hosting the second and third rounds in one of the regions.

RPI was bad this year as we have discussed. I was picking on NC St as a ridiculous seed and I saw they went down in Rd 1 on Pk's as well to UCF. Good for UCLA who now gets an unseeded opponent.

By Massey Stanford has #s 4 (UNC), 5 (us) and 6 (UND) all in our regional. Even beyond not hosting, we got no favors in the seeding with 3 of the top 6 in the same bracket.

---

On a total side note - how the heck did USC lose to UC Irvine?

Couldn't happen to. a lovelier school but seriously? UCI was 66 in Massey and too lazy to look up their RPI.