12-20-2022, 10:59 AM
If you are an astronomer what do you call "black hole"?
Place of extreme gravitational field?
Place of extreme gravitational field?
The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by gailtate - 12-20-2022, 09:01 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 09:14 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 12:23 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 06:53 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 09:55 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 10:29 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 10:43 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by SamuelMcF - 12-20-2022, 10:47 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 11:08 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 11:11 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by JohnR34231 - 12-20-2022, 10:59 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Beeg_Dawg - 12-20-2022, 11:04 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 11:24 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by McKenwood - 12-20-2022, 11:34 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 09:16 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-20-2022, 12:08 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 01:25 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 09:59 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Snorlax94 - 12-20-2022, 01:56 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:15 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 02:25 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:33 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:18 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CompSci87 - 12-20-2022, 03:33 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 03:45 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by qwerty49 - 12-20-2022, 02:35 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-20-2022, 09:45 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 10:01 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:43 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-20-2022, 07:09 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-21-2022, 08:19 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-21-2022, 08:53 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-21-2022, 10:46 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-21-2022, 10:07 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-21-2022, 01:19 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-21-2022, 05:29 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by terry - 12-21-2022, 06:27 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-21-2022, 07:27 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Madera86 - 12-21-2022, 10:11 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-21-2022, 10:42 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-21-2022, 08:51 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-22-2022, 08:56 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-22-2022, 07:09 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-22-2022, 07:31 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 12-22-2022, 07:38 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-22-2022, 09:45 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 81alum - 12-23-2022, 11:13 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-23-2022, 02:07 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-23-2022, 03:06 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Canalejas - 12-23-2022, 03:40 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by TreesAndBirds - 01-07-2023, 10:07 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 01-13-2023, 08:30 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 10:42 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Goose - 01-07-2023, 11:34 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-12-2023, 06:24 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 01-13-2023, 02:17 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 01-17-2023, 05:31 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-17-2023, 08:10 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 01-27-2023, 06:23 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 01-12-2023, 06:32 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 09:34 AM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-13-2023, 02:45 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 01-13-2023, 02:51 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-13-2023, 08:35 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 10:00 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-16-2023, 04:07 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by jacket3ree - 01-16-2023, 06:22 PM
RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-26-2023, 10:08 PM