The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
1
2
3
4
5

The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this

martyup
GIF Master

Posts: 11,828
Threads: 258
Joined: Sep 2013

#8

12-20-2022, 11:08 AM

(This post was last modified: 12-20-2022, 11:18 AM by martyup.)

(12-20-2022, 10:47 AM)SamuelMcF Wrote:
(12-20-2022, 10:43 AM)Bampa Wrote:
(12-20-2022, 10:29 AM)martyup Wrote: I have no words for this. No pictures either. Nothing.

(And I'm sure this response offends someone.)

You used the word "nothing." I am offened. GASP!

I am offended that you misspelled "offended." How dare you.

I'm offended that you spellsplained him.

Oh crap, I used "him."

Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.

#8

martyup

12-20-2022, 11:08 AM

(This post was last modified: 12-20-2022, 11:18 AM by martyup.)

(12-20-2022, 10:47 AM)SamuelMcF Wrote:
(12-20-2022, 10:43 AM)Bampa Wrote:
(12-20-2022, 10:29 AM)martyup Wrote: I have no words for this. No pictures either. Nothing.

(And I'm sure this response offends someone.)

You used the word "nothing." I am offened. GASP!

I am offended that you misspelled "offended." How dare you.

I'm offended that you spellsplained him.

Oh crap, I used "him."

Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by gailtate - 12-20-2022, 09:01 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 09:14 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 12:23 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 06:53 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 09:55 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 10:29 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 10:43 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by SamuelMcF - 12-20-2022, 10:47 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 11:08 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 11:11 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by JohnR34231 - 12-20-2022, 10:59 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Beeg_Dawg - 12-20-2022, 11:04 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 11:24 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by McKenwood - 12-20-2022, 11:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 09:16 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-20-2022, 12:08 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 01:25 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 09:59 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Snorlax94 - 12-20-2022, 01:56 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:15 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 02:25 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:33 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:18 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CompSci87 - 12-20-2022, 03:33 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 03:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by qwerty49 - 12-20-2022, 02:35 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-20-2022, 09:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 10:01 PM

MVCard - by MVCard - 12-20-2022, 02:36 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:43 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-20-2022, 07:09 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-21-2022, 08:19 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-21-2022, 08:53 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-21-2022, 10:46 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-21-2022, 10:07 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-21-2022, 01:19 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-21-2022, 05:29 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by terry - 12-21-2022, 06:27 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-21-2022, 07:27 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Madera86 - 12-21-2022, 10:11 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-21-2022, 10:42 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-21-2022, 08:51 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-22-2022, 08:56 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-22-2022, 07:09 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-22-2022, 07:31 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 12-22-2022, 07:38 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-22-2022, 09:45 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 81alum - 12-23-2022, 11:13 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-23-2022, 02:07 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-23-2022, 03:06 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Canalejas - 12-23-2022, 03:40 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by TreesAndBirds - 01-07-2023, 10:07 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 01-13-2023, 08:30 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 10:42 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Goose - 01-07-2023, 11:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-12-2023, 06:24 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 01-13-2023, 02:17 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 01-17-2023, 05:31 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-17-2023, 08:10 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 01-27-2023, 06:23 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 01-12-2023, 06:32 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 09:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-13-2023, 02:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 01-13-2023, 02:51 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-13-2023, 08:35 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 10:00 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-16-2023, 04:07 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by jacket3ree - 01-16-2023, 06:22 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-26-2023, 10:08 PM

View a Printable Version