The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this

Hello There, Guest! Welcome to The CardBoard!

Feel free to Register and discuss on various topics with likeminded people. Already have an account? Please Login!

Thread Rating:

2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
1
2
3
4
5

The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this

cardcrimson
Tech Mogul

Posts: 5,022
Threads: 285
Joined: Feb 2014

#16

12-20-2022, 02:15 PM

(This post was last modified: 12-20-2022, 02:17 PM by cardcrimson.)

Well sadly, institutional racism is still alive and well at Stanford. A quick perusal of most departments show that they continue to offer advanced degrees steeped in racism. We should all be ashamed, especially those of us who earned that extra degree by becoming adept in our field of study.

https://gradadmissions.stanford.edu/explore-programs

Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.

#16

cardcrimson

12-20-2022, 02:15 PM

(This post was last modified: 12-20-2022, 02:17 PM by cardcrimson.)

Well sadly, institutional racism is still alive and well at Stanford. A quick perusal of most departments show that they continue to offer advanced degrees steeped in racism. We should all be ashamed, especially those of us who earned that extra degree by becoming adept in our field of study.

https://gradadmissions.stanford.edu/explore-programs

Free Phogge!!!! And no, crimson doesn't refer to the Tide.

Find

Reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread

The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by gailtate - 12-20-2022, 09:01 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 09:14 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 12:23 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-20-2022, 06:53 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-20-2022, 09:55 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 10:29 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 10:43 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by SamuelMcF - 12-20-2022, 10:47 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 12-20-2022, 11:08 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Bampa - 12-20-2022, 11:11 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by JohnR34231 - 12-20-2022, 10:59 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Beeg_Dawg - 12-20-2022, 11:04 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 11:24 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by McKenwood - 12-20-2022, 11:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 09:16 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-20-2022, 12:08 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 01:25 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 09:59 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Snorlax94 - 12-20-2022, 01:56 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:15 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 02:25 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-20-2022, 02:33 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:18 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CompSci87 - 12-20-2022, 03:33 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 03:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by qwerty49 - 12-20-2022, 02:35 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-20-2022, 09:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-20-2022, 10:01 PM

MVCard - by MVCard - 12-20-2022, 02:36 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-20-2022, 03:43 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-20-2022, 05:05 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-20-2022, 07:09 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-21-2022, 08:19 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 12-21-2022, 08:53 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-21-2022, 10:46 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by CTcard - 12-21-2022, 10:07 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-21-2022, 01:19 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-21-2022, 05:29 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by terry - 12-21-2022, 06:27 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 12-21-2022, 07:27 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Madera86 - 12-21-2022, 10:11 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Leftcoast - 12-21-2022, 10:42 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 12-21-2022, 08:51 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 12-22-2022, 08:56 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 12-22-2022, 07:09 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by dabigv13 - 12-22-2022, 07:31 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 12-22-2022, 07:38 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 82lsju - 12-22-2022, 09:45 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 81alum - 12-23-2022, 11:13 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by murky - 12-23-2022, 02:07 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 12-23-2022, 03:06 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Canalejas - 12-23-2022, 03:40 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by TreesAndBirds - 01-07-2023, 10:07 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by winflop - 01-13-2023, 08:30 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-07-2023, 10:42 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Goose - 01-07-2023, 11:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-12-2023, 06:24 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by M T - 01-13-2023, 02:17 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by 2006alum - 01-17-2023, 05:31 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-17-2023, 08:10 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Mick - 01-27-2023, 06:23 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by Phogge - 01-12-2023, 06:32 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 09:34 AM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-13-2023, 02:45 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by cardcrimson - 01-13-2023, 02:51 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by lex24 - 01-13-2023, 08:35 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by martyup - 01-13-2023, 10:00 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-16-2023, 04:07 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by jacket3ree - 01-16-2023, 06:22 PM

RE: The "old" LSJUMB would've had fun with this - by BostonCard - 01-26-2023, 10:08 PM

View a Printable Version