[BostonCard]

To make it Stanford-related, the order is likely irrelevant, since California already makes most non-compete clauses unenforceable.  To make it sports related, imagine if a school tried to have a clause in their contract that an assistant coach couldn't go on to coach for a team a competitor team (for example, that Taylor couldn't leave Sacramento to coach at Stanford because we have a game against them next year); that strikes me as bad, even though undoubtably some propriatary knowledge (such as play calls or gameplays) would go with the coach.

As for jurisdiction, I think non-compete clauses interfere in the labor market, and entrench the employer monopsony power.

BC

[BostonCard]

To make it Stanford-related, the order is likely irrelevant, since California already makes most non-compete clauses unenforceable.  To make it sports related, imagine if a school tried to have a clause in their contract that an assistant coach couldn't go on to coach for a team a competitor team (for example, that Taylor couldn't leave Sacramento to coach at Stanford because we have a game against them next year); that strikes me as bad, even though undoubtably some propriatary knowledge (such as play calls or gameplays) would go with the coach.

As for jurisdiction, I think non-compete clauses interfere in the labor market, and entrench the employer monopsony power.

BC