01-22-2023, 04:11 PM
Interesting perspective, and thanks for the hard work, Matt.
I realize it’s not entirely symmetrical, but one way of looking at the list is that the first 12 were by definition the relatively more “productive” half of the program through the years. And that the first 6 were the “top-performing” quartile in terms of future NFL talent.
I realize it’s not entirely symmetrical, but one way of looking at the list is that the first 12 were by definition the relatively more “productive” half of the program through the years. And that the first 6 were the “top-performing” quartile in terms of future NFL talent.