I really like Charlie Creme, and over the many years he has done this he has seemed quite sympathetic to Stanford and Tara. Unfortunately, over the many years he has done this, his predictions are often wildly inaccurate. He is a lot of fun, but the committee seems to pay absolutely no attention to his work.
I often think Creme by himself is fairer and more knowledgeable than the whole committee. So take ESPN Braketology with about a million grains of salt.
Now add to that the considerable likelihood that we will not go undefeated the rest of the way in conference and the conference tournament--and consider where we may be at the end if we lose one or two more. Will LSU with one loss be higher than a Stanford with 3-4 losses? Oh the tangled web we weave.
There is only one thing that really matters. We just need to win 6 in a row at the end.
I often think Creme by himself is fairer and more knowledgeable than the whole committee. So take ESPN Braketology with about a million grains of salt.
Now add to that the considerable likelihood that we will not go undefeated the rest of the way in conference and the conference tournament--and consider where we may be at the end if we lose one or two more. Will LSU with one loss be higher than a Stanford with 3-4 losses? Oh the tangled web we weave.
There is only one thing that really matters. We just need to win 6 in a row at the end.
