03-08-2023, 06:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 03-08-2023, 06:42 PM by OutsiderFan.)
Schools have no (or at least are not suppose to have) direct affiliation with NIL collectives, so no school will be "participating in NIL" by definition. So I'm not grasping how Muir and Taylor saying "we won't be participating in NIL" means anything meaningful in the sense that Stanford is losing something here as a result.
Again, the Lifetime Cardinal collective is giving each football player $10k starting this season. It's not coming from Stanford, so Stanford isn't participating in it, but the fact is the players are going to benefit from NIL. So it's curious to me how there can be concern Stanford won't be participating in NIL, when Stanford in fact will derive benefit from NIL with this Lifetime Cardinal collective.
Again, the Lifetime Cardinal collective is giving each football player $10k starting this season. It's not coming from Stanford, so Stanford isn't participating in it, but the fact is the players are going to benefit from NIL. So it's curious to me how there can be concern Stanford won't be participating in NIL, when Stanford in fact will derive benefit from NIL with this Lifetime Cardinal collective.