06-17-2023, 07:43 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-17-2023, 07:47 PM by Blue Hawk (Mizzou) Card.)
(06-17-2023, 07:09 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(06-17-2023, 05:30 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(06-17-2023, 04:13 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(06-17-2023, 04:09 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote: [quote="TonyLima" pid='392635' dateline='1687041390']
Roxy Bernstein agrees re the strike zone. Here’s the story on Brandon Cooper.
I’m not sure if Roxy was thinking of a different pitch but Bruno’s 2-2 pitch to Wilken missed both high and outside. It wasn’t really close.
Here’s what Wes Clements says. And this from the play bybplay. “Wilken walked (3-2 KBBSBB); Kurtz advanced to second.” There were two pitches after the second strike.
If you go to the box score of the game on ESPN you can see the pitch location. I think it was a bit higher than the spot shown, but it’s clearly well off the plate. The dead giveaway that it was outside was Moore yanking his glove way back to his left after he caught it.
I’ll put it like this, if that had been a Stanford batter at the plate and that pitch was called a strike, I would’ve been livid.
Don't rely on ESPN replays. Decide for yourself. Decide for yourself
[/quote]
I probably should not have watched that video, as it has not helped my mood. When you watch it, keep in mind that blue was giving a very generous high outside corner this afternoon. If the ump gets to set the strike zone, which we allow by refusing to allow machines to make the calls, his strike zone should be consistent. Given that umops strike zone today, that was a gorgeous pitch. You can't ask a kid to do anything more on that pitch than he did. If he would have grooved it down the middle and watched it ssil over the fence, we eould have been on his case for tering up the ball for a power hitter.
Btw, in my previous post, I forgot to credit the Wake kid for a great hit. Even if they force the pitcher to throw meet, the batter has to hit it. Good on him for foing so.
(06-17-2023, 07:43 PM)Blue Hawk (Mizzou) Card Wrote:(06-17-2023, 07:09 PM)TonyLima Wrote:(06-17-2023, 05:30 PM)StanfordMatt Wrote:(06-17-2023, 04:13 PM)TonyLima Wrote: [quote="StanfordMatt" pid='392645' dateline='1687043380']
I’m not sure if Roxy was thinking of a different pitch but Bruno’s 2-2 pitch to Wilken missed both high and outside. It wasn’t really close.
Here’s what Wes Clements says. And this from the play bybplay. “Wilken walked (3-2 KBBSBB); Kurtz advanced to second.” There were two pitches after the second strike.
If you go to the box score of the game on ESPN you can see the pitch location. I think it was a bit higher than the spot shown, but it’s clearly well off the plate. The dead giveaway that it was outside was Moore yanking his glove way back to his left after he caught it.
I’ll put it like this, if that had been a Stanford batter at the plate and that pitch was called a strike, I would’ve been livid.
Don't rely on ESPN replays. Decide for yourself. Decide for yourself
I probably should not have watched that video, as it has not helped my mood. When you watch it, keep in mind that blue was giving a very generous high outside corner this afternoon. If the ump gets to set the strike zone, which we allow by refusing to allow machines to make the calls, his strike zone should be consistent. Given that ump's strike zone today, that was a gorgeous pitch. You can't ask a kid to do anything more on that pitch than he did. If he would have grooved it down the middle and watched it sail over the fence, we would have been on his case for teeing up the ball for a power hitter.
Btw, in my previous post, I forgot to credit the Wake kid for a great hit. Even if they force the pitcher to throw meat, the batter has to hit it. Good on him for doing so.
