[cctop]

It's been a bit since I've read the report, but I seem to recall that Harvard actually scored in negative numbers, something like -10.89 due to three of the professors contending that they'd been de facto censored and reprimanded, and that Harvard's score was artificially raised to 0.00 because they would have otherwise been below the scale.  I may be misremembering, and I'm too lazy to look it up.

Yeah, they say in the report that they raised Harvard's score from a negative number to 0.00.

I'd tell them not to artificially adjust their numbers for just one school.  Stick with your rating scale, or adjust your scale for all schools.  At the very least don't report your adjusted rating as being precise to two decimal places.

[cctop]

It's been a bit since I've read the report, but I seem to recall that Harvard actually scored in negative numbers, something like -10.89 due to three of the professors contending that they'd been de facto censored and reprimanded, and that Harvard's score was artificially raised to 0.00 because they would have otherwise been below the scale.  I may be misremembering, and I'm too lazy to look it up.

Yeah, they say in the report that they raised Harvard's score from a negative number to 0.00.

I'd tell them not to artificially adjust their numbers for just one school.  Stick with your rating scale, or adjust your scale for all schools.  At the very least don't report your adjusted rating as being precise to two decimal places.