since non-attorneys were welcome to hold opinions, i offer as a layman that it would seem to depend on what the pac-12 bought for the price of the poaching penalty. it does indeed seem to me that the pac-12 is correct to assert that the poaching penalties are unreasonably high for the privilege of scheduling games. i believe there is a typical fee paid to a (visiting) school for playing. these fees are way higher.
Question for attorneys who post here…
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Messages In This Thread
Question for attorneys who post here… - by Giants - 09-24-2024, 12:08 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by martyup - 09-24-2024, 01:58 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by TrumpCard - 09-24-2024, 02:15 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by Mick - 09-24-2024, 02:37 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by 82 Card - 09-24-2024, 03:03 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by TrumpCard - 09-24-2024, 03:20 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by 82lsju - 09-24-2024, 03:57 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by 82 Card - 09-24-2024, 04:07 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by Giants - 09-24-2024, 04:29 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by jonnyss - 09-24-2024, 05:03 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by jacket3ree - 09-24-2024, 07:03 PM
RE: Question for attorneys who post here… - by TonyLima - 09-24-2024, 09:57 PM
