[jonnyss]

Perhaps he'll charge them with 60 years of retroactive compensation. . . .

I understand from the article that UCLA has been paying rent.

yes, but apparently only $300,000 per year for the 10 acres, which i believe comes out to $2500 per month per acre - a sweetheart deal. also, ucla sold naming rights for a practice infield for $2 million and kept all the money. the judge wrote that the land must "principally benefit veterans" and ordered the va to build 750 units of housing for homeless vets on the land.
link

[jonnyss]

Perhaps he'll charge them with 60 years of retroactive compensation. . . .

I understand from the article that UCLA has been paying rent.

yes, but apparently only $300,000 per year for the 10 acres, which i believe comes out to $2500 per month per acre - a sweetheart deal. also, ucla sold naming rights for a practice infield for $2 million and kept all the money. the judge wrote that the land must "principally benefit veterans" and ordered the va to build 750 units of housing for homeless vets on the land.
link