10-15-2024, 08:01 PM
Everyone knows that NIL is a farce. The money given to these athletes is to induce them to play at a particular school, not for advertising purposes. If NIL payments are legit purchases of rights to use the athlete's name, image, and likeness, then the owners of those rights would be selling them to advertisers. Is there any evidence that the NIL collectives are selling the rights that they purchased to advertisers?
Put a glide in your stride and a dip in your hip.