[washingtonismoney]

Not sure the ordinary categories of good and bad really fit here. What I think is that Stanford\'s defense is the same type as last year, but slightly better. It\'s good against bad offenses, but bad against good ones. I can\'t remember a Stanford defense last year looking as dominant as it did for an entire game as against Notre Dame, which isn\'t nothing.

Not every team is going to have the wideouts and QB as USC does, or the overall speed of Oregon. In fact, none of the rest of the teams on our schedule have as formidable an offense as Oregon\'s or (perhaps) USC\'s. Things might well get better. Or maybe they won\'t. Probably they won\'t.

[washingtonismoney]

Not sure the ordinary categories of good and bad really fit here. What I think is that Stanford\'s defense is the same type as last year, but slightly better. It\'s good against bad offenses, but bad against good ones. I can\'t remember a Stanford defense last year looking as dominant as it did for an entire game as against Notre Dame, which isn\'t nothing.

Not every team is going to have the wideouts and QB as USC does, or the overall speed of Oregon. In fact, none of the rest of the teams on our schedule have as formidable an offense as Oregon\'s or (perhaps) USC\'s. Things might well get better. Or maybe they won\'t. Probably they won\'t.