[cardcrimson]

Saving my thoughts for when we figure out who the new director will be.  Athletic Director is a tough job, and change for change's sake is not always a winning strategy.

So you're saying we should have stuck with Muir?

Let me see, using my powers of English reading comprehension, I feel like I said nothing of the sort.  Hope you can figure that out for yourself next time.

Appreciate the disparaging comment. Thanks. 

And fwiw, I still read your comment as the alternative could be worse than Muir, and it might be too much a gamble to take. The grass is always greener kind of thing. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If I'm mistaken, what does "change for change's sake is not always a winning strategy" mean?

[cardcrimson]

Saving my thoughts for when we figure out who the new director will be.  Athletic Director is a tough job, and change for change's sake is not always a winning strategy.

So you're saying we should have stuck with Muir?

Let me see, using my powers of English reading comprehension, I feel like I said nothing of the sort.  Hope you can figure that out for yourself next time.

Appreciate the disparaging comment. Thanks. 

And fwiw, I still read your comment as the alternative could be worse than Muir, and it might be too much a gamble to take. The grass is always greener kind of thing. A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush. If I'm mistaken, what does "change for change's sake is not always a winning strategy" mean?